Hugging Face
Models
Datasets
Spaces
Community
Docs
Enterprise
Pricing
Log In
Sign Up
Open to Work
13.3
TFLOPS
8
36
Shane
crownelius
Follow
bethrezen's profile picture
MrDevolver's profile picture
armand0e's profile picture
11 followers
·
20 following
https://ko-fi.com/abcuo
AI & ML interests
LLM, RL, DL, ML, AGI, Distillation, Workflow Automation, Creative Writing
Recent Activity
published
a dataset
33 minutes ago
crownelius/private-finetuning-data
updated
a dataset
37 minutes ago
crownelius/private-finetuning-data
reacted
to
AbstractPhil
's
post
with 👀
about 1 hour ago
The Rosetta Stone geometric vocabulary and the ramping up capacity. What makes this particular invariant special, is the existence within all structures I've tested so far. I had Claude write up the direct article based on what we built together, but I've tested it on many substructures. This is flawed, and I have a series of answers to making it more accurate. First a reconstruction from the ground up. This means each shape is specifically built upward from the substructure to the point of inductive deviance. This will be less quick at first and then build speed as I optimize like the last system did. The "saddle" problem; the system detected saddles because there wasn't enough deviance in the shapes to attenuate to more cardinality and more aligned substructures. The blobs were around 30-40% of the overall patches, which interpolated into the others produced a fair approximation. It MOST DEFINITELY did see those shapes in their voxel complexity. This is real. https://claude.ai/public/artifacts/bf1256c7-726d-4943-88ad-d6addb263b8b You can play with a public claude artifact dedicated to viewing the current shape spectrum - and with that know exactly why it's flawed. The flawed and repetitive shapes. I rapid prototyped and there are multiple redundant shapes that simply don't classify well or at all. Not to mention the rotation simply doesn't help much of the time, or doesn't exist with many shapes. This will be rectified in the next variation. Projecting to shared latent space as a catalyst to allow growing subjective geoflow matched step variance, rather than simply direct classification. This will theoretically allow for full channel-to-channel invariant features to be mapped from structure to structure, and the very formula that encapsulated them to be directly baked into the math rather than classified as a substructure analysis. There are many challenges between here and there, so stay tuned my friends as I plot the geometric language of pretrained AI.
View all activity
Organizations
models
1
crownelius/The-Crow-9B
Updated
3 days ago
•
1
datasets
35
Sort:Â Recently updated
crownelius/private-finetuning-data
Preview
•
Updated
36 minutes ago
crownelius/Creative_Writing_ShareGPT_Enhanced
Updated
about 5 hours ago
crownelius/Creative_Writing_Multiturn_Enhanced
Updated
about 5 hours ago
crownelius/Creative-Writing-Sonnet4.6-800x
Viewer
•
Updated
about 7 hours ago
•
833
crownelius/Creative-Writing-Qwen3.5Plus-2000x
Viewer
•
Updated
about 8 hours ago
•
2.64k
crownelius/Creative-Writing-Reasoning-KimiK2.5-600x
Viewer
•
Updated
about 8 hours ago
•
655
crownelius/Creative-Writing-Gemini3Pro-2700x
Viewer
•
Updated
about 8 hours ago
•
2.75k
crownelius/Qwen3.5-Creative-Reasoning
Viewer
•
Updated
1 day ago
•
137
•
3
crownelius/Creative-Writing-Part-Two
Viewer
•
Updated
1 day ago
•
5.37k
•
7
crownelius/Novel-Crafting-250x
Viewer
•
Updated
1 day ago
•
500
•
9
View 35 datasets