Datasets:
to-be
/
epstein-emails

Dataset card Data Studio Files
xet
Community
1
id
int64
1
6.58k
email_document_id
int64
1
1.95k
source_filename
stringlengths
26
26
subject
stringclasses
795 values
message_order
int64
0
18
from_address
stringclasses
676 values
to_address
stringclasses
440 values
other_recipients
stringclasses
129 values
timestamp_raw
stringlengths
0
45
timestamp_iso
stringlengths
14
14
message_html
stringlengths
0
10.4k
document_id
stringlengths
22
22
558
178
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025163.txt
Re: Re:
2
Jeffrey Epstein
Pritzker, Tom
[]
Monday, November 28, 2016 12:35 PM
20161128123500
<p>im in wed, fri. edelman?</p><p>please note</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025165
559
179
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025169.txt
Re: Your Special Day
0
David Grosof
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:07 AM
20170120010700
<p>Congratulations on another spin around the sun.</p><p>I would like to offer you a birthday present: my best efforts for a few hours on something where I might be able to contribute either to making something good happen for you or help you prevent the bad.</p><p>We haven't talked much at all for quite some time, so I'm not sure of the nature of your current interests but here are some of mine, where I feel I either have some special capability or can get access to those who have such.</p><ul><li>open science -- open access publishing, data publishing, and open culture institutions considered as a network with largely consistent and mutually reinforcing values: Public Library of Science (PLoS), Wikipedia, Internet Archive, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Creative Commons, along with allied US, UK, European governmental and NGO funding sources and other institutions.</li><li>early-stage life science-based ventures, especially those with one or more of these technologies: optics, wearable-sensors, brain-computer interface, behavioral engineering that goes beyond robo-noodging. I am not up to speed on synthetic bio and CRISPR, but I have a good friend who is.</li><li>cybersecurity for you and your life. I have carefully monitored the web for articles about you and I have reason to think that those will persist indefinitely. I would be remiss as your friend if I did not encourage you to be as diligent and smart as possible in using tools like Signal, two-factor/multi-factor authentication, taking webmail archives off the web onto your own secure privately maintained archive or deleted (unlike Podesta), and other measures.</li><li>publicity for your cool-ass creative and important philanthropy in support of really good and adventuresome, high-risk basic science research. Most obvious benefit: it would be nice to know you hung out with the bright</li></ul>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025170
560
179
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025169.txt
Re: Your Special Day
1
Jeffrey Epstein
David Grosof
[]
1/20/2017 12:10:12 PM
20170120121012
<p>pretty well</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025169
561
180
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025199.txt
Re:
0
Jonathan Farkas <IMI>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 5:58 AM
20180302055800
Hi Jeffrey do you think this is Smoot Hawley 2 which topped us into the depression Bloomberg just quoted trump trade wars are good and easy to win thanks jf Somers is going to mar a lago lunch Saturday fund raiser for djt
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025199
562
180
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025199.txt
Re:
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Jonathan Farkas
[]
3/2/2018 12:47:41 PM
20180302124741
funn /. its a wild time
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025199
563
181
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025295.txt
Fwd: Game On paper from Dr. Laffer
0
Nicholas Drinkwater
Landon Thomas Jr.
[]
Mon, Nov 14, 2016 at 11:38 AM
20161114113800
Dear Landon,<br><br>Please see the attached paper from Dr. Laffer.<br><br>Best,<br>Nick
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025295
564
181
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025295.txt
Fwd: Game On paper from Dr. Laffer
1
Landon Thomas Jr.
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
11/14/2016 5:32:04 PM
20161114173204
These old school supply siders supposedly have DT's ear. Your old pal Larry Kudlow/Laffer/Steve Moore. I think they basically wrote his tax plan. Steve Forbes for Treasury Secretary??;)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025295
565
182
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025291.txt
Bill Clinton identified in lawsuit against pedophile Jeffrey Epstein | Daily Mail Online
0
Darren Indyke
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
1/14/2015 11:56:48 PM
20150114235648
<a href='http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2584309/Bill-Clinton-identified-lawsuit-against-former-friend-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein-regular-orgies-Caribbean-compound-former-president-visited-multiple-times.html'>http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2584309/Bill-Clinton-identified-lawsuit-against-former-friend-pedophile-Jeffrey-Epstein-regular-orgies-Caribbean-compound-former-president-visited-multiple-times.html</a>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025291
566
183
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025200.txt
Re:
0
Jeffrey Epstein
Weingarten, Reid
[]
Sunday, May 20, 2018 11:16 AM
20180520111600
who is going to represent stephen halper. that will be fun
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025200
567
183
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025200.txt
Re:
1
Weingarten, Reid
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Sun, May 20, 2018 at 8:39 PM
20180520203900
Educate me
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025201
568
183
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025200.txt
Re:
2
Jeffrey Epstein
Weingarten, Reid
[]
Sunday, May 20, 2018 3:45 PM
20180520154500
hes the fbi informant. Mi 5 cia, oy.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025201
569
183
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025200.txt
Re:
3
Jeffrey Epstein
Weingarten, Reid
[]
5/20/2018 8:02:59 PM
20180520200259
a us citizen, working for mi 5 . calls trump campaign insiders and tryr to get info for mi5 and fbi. . including after trunmp takes office.. 1 did obama know'? if a us citizen working for britain spies. can they spy on americans? who pays . paid. wild. donald focused on this bigtime
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025201
570
184
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025195.txt
Re: Is Donald still feeling good
0
LHS <W>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:22 PM
20170528192200
R u still plugged in to the show?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025195
571
184
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025195.txt
Re: Is Donald still feeling good
1
Jeffrey Epstein
LHS < >
[]
Sunday, May 28, 2017 7:28 PM
20170528192800
wild, there will be some changes this week.. funny but kaslowitz is getting turned down repeatedly, by firms unwilling to represent donald.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025196
572
184
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025195.txt
Re: Is Donald still feeling good
2
LHS <W>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:36 PM
20170528193600
More would represent Donald if Kaslowitz out of picture. Not surprising, very hard to be law firm representing POTUS and know what to do when potus lies to u.<br><br>My world thinks poorly of Gorelick for representing Jared.<br><br>How guilty is Donald?<br><br>Of crudity surely<br>Of gross ignorance surely<br>Of being utterly without the intellect temperament for job surely<br>Of being over line on family profiting very likely<br>Of gross disregard for appearances almost surely.<br>Of Russians having financial leverage. Less clear<br>Of Russians helping in. Election w complicity of his campaign plausible but not certain<br><br>Strikes me if u work for Donald u don't free lance so he is guilty of whatever his campaign did.<br><br>Do u agree w foregoing?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025195
573
184
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025195.txt
Re: Is Donald still feeling good
3
Jeffrey Epstein
LHS _____________________________
[]
5/28/2017 11:43:17 PM
20170528234317
your world does not understand how dumb he really is. he will blame everyone around him. for bad results. . gary cohn in good place. . as is jared. all others , not long for this world.. intresting argument whether using whats app is obstruction of justice. deletes after sending. ?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025195
574
185
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025197.txt
Re: Is Donald still feeling good
0
LHS < >
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:22 PM
20170528192200
R u still plugged in to the show?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025198
576
185
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025197.txt
Re: Is Donald still feeling good
2
LHS < >
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:36 PM
20170528193600
More would represent Donald if Kaslowitz out of picture. Not surprising, very hard to be law firm representing POTUS and know what to do when potus lies to u.<br><br>My world thinks poorly of Gorelick for representing Jared.<br><br>How guilty is Donald?<br><br>Of crudity surely<br>Of gross ignorance surely<br>Of being utterly without the intellect temperament for job surely<br>Of being over line on family profiting very likely<br>Of gross disregard for appearances almost surely.<br>Of Russians having financial leverage. Less clear<br>Of Russians helping in. Election w complicity of his campaign plausible but not certain<br><br>Strikes me if u work for Donald u don't free lance so he is guilty of whatever his campaign did.<br><br>Do u agree w foregoing?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025197
577
185
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025197.txt
Re: Is Donald still feeling good
3
Jeffrey Epstein
LHS [ ]
[]
5/28/2017 11:44:32 PM
20170528234432
you should hook up with gates or hoffmand and do the donor advised fund. you should lead the education initaitive. , church, genetics. , jobs climate projects. , etc.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025197
578
186
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025121.txt
Re: Is Donald still feeling good
0
Lawrence Summers
Jeffrey Epstein
["lhsoffice [lhsoffice@lawrencesummers.com]"]
6/2/2017 3:08:29 AM
20170602030829
<p>??</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025121
579
186
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025121.txt
Re: Is Donald still feeling good
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Lawrence Summers
[]
Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:13 PM -0400
20170602011300
<p>prospectus</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025121
581
186
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025121.txt
Re: Is Donald still feeling good
3
Jeffrey Epstein
Lawrence Summers
[]
May 28, 2017, at 7:49 PM
20170528194900
<p>BTW, still not sure why michael klein decided to try to attack me. wasn't smart or necessary, . used our friendship as a source, . thought you should know. not nice</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025121
585
187
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025511.txt
poetry and science
0
Lisa New
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
12/2/2014 6:29:16 PM
20141202182916
<p>Dear Jeffrey,</p><p>Apropos of our conversation of a few minutes ago, This proposal went to someone I thought was interested in the environment and science but who seems, in fact, far more interested in supporting TV on a broad range of topics.</p><p>500,000 would fund this initiative as the second HGSE course (after Poetry of the City) and could begin immediately, Jan 1.. I'd be thrilled to include other scientists you name, perhaps taping the group in a session on metaphor at the edges of fields.</p><p>INote that taped sessions already include economics, marine biology, astronomy, evolutionary biology, zoology, physics and computer science. Richard Dawkins, Walter Isaacson, David Mossberg and David Malan have all said yes to tapings. Footage for all the others is already shot and ready for post production.</p><p>I am having a drink with Dean of Ed School today and can explore this with him among other topics</p><p>Lisa</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025511
586
188
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025140.txt
Re:
0
Robert Trivers
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
6/25/2018 2:19:44 AM
20180625021944
<p>perhaps i misunderstood "let's concentrate on you"<br>Jamaica is bad enough but i have mastered that—at least the danger-4th highest murder rate in the world<br>as for the us i have alienated large stretches of it—i will spare you the details<br><br>i was amused that you are now friends with JD Watson<br>he single-handedly prevented me from getting a Junior Fellowship at Harvard<br>In 1972 I got my PhD in Biology and it was conventional to nominate the very best post-docs for a Junior Fellowship, Harvard's most prestigious award—it provided three years of research support without any duties. I was the best student out of Evolutionary and Organismic Biology in more than 20 years. The entire department was behind me.<br>but Watson was on the 3-man committee, in charge of all the science candidates and he deemed my two papers, reciprocal altruism and parental investment and sexual selection as "not being science" and dismissed me in one sentence. Well bless his soul, he now does not even understand his own subject—yes, i speak of genetics—because having remained resolutely ignorant of evolutionary logic and biology he can neither understand the shape and form of the genotype nor how it differs systematically within life<br><br>i have been preparing something for you for a long time on human intelligence, Africa, parasites etc because i prefer to get things right but i am ready to send you what i have<br>main focus is—Africans stupid or smart?</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025140
587
188
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025140.txt
Re:
1
Robert Trivers
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 4:23 PM
20180624162300
<p>Many thanks. By all means let's concentrate on me and not Trump. If Enhanced Learning can make its annual gift of 30 that would have a huge positive effect on me and my future. Let the market take care of itself All best</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025141
588
188
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025140.txt
Re:
2
Jeffrey Epstein
Robert Trivers
[]
Jun 24, 2018, at 2:02 PM
20180624140200
<p>trump ok, lets concentrate on you. trade war maybe good. shakes things up</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025141
589
188
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025140.txt
Re:
3
Robert Trivers
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Sun, Jun 24, 2018 at 8:11 PM
20180624201100
<p>Jeffrey<br>finally landed<br>very unpleasant journey<br>you had nothing to do with how Chapman acted and i apologise for suggesting it might be otherwise<br>it was entirely against me, partly motivated by a spiteful ex-friend<br>consulted two lawyers that Gordon recommended but they were very discouraging<br><br>the basic problem is simple—I am going against a strong national trend—well-known man after well-known man is being brought low for alleged his misbehaviour toward women—in some case well-deserved prison time (Cosby and perhaps Weinstein) in many other cases, simply being run out of institutions—exactly my fate<br>furthermore in he say/she say confrontations the evidence has shifted—in University settings at least—from 'beyond a reasonable doubt' to a 'preponderance of evidence' to 'more positive than negative'<br>the loss is huge, on the order of a half million to a million dollars, meant to keep me alive (they were going to offer a five-year contract) while i let my 'inheritance' be spent on children and grandchildren while also growing<br>i have no choice but to work<br><br>i will get my revised Wild Life to an agent later this week—have added 5 new chapters and a few sections—much stronger for the inclusion of my major scientific work—1. social theory based on natural selection and 2. selfish genetic elements selected within organisms<br>then i have Honour Killings set to roll, as well as another one<br><br>hope you are thriving—and also hope Trump will stop this international trade nonsense—a lose/lose war—especially as it affects the stock market or so it seems to me<br>best wishes</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025141
590
189
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025128.txt
Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric
0
The Washington Post <emailge.washingtonpost.com>
Summers, Lawrence H. <>
[]
Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 9:04 AM -0400
20171011090400
<p>Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric</p><p>Billionaire Thomas J. Barrack Jr. has done what few others in Trump's orbit have done: He told the president, in effect, that he was wrong. "In my opinion, he's better than this," Barrack said.</p><p>Trump's relationship with Barrack is one of the most important, if little understood, of the president's life, offering a case study of what it takes to remain close to him in a time of such turmoil.</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025130
591
189
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025128.txt
Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric
1
Lawrence Summers <__________________________________>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Wed, Oct 11, 2017 at 11:04 AM
20171011110400
<p>Your pal should stay out of press.</p><p>Public link to manafort will be a disaster.</p><p>This is a staggering shit show.</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025129
592
189
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025128.txt
Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric
2
Jeffrey Epstein
Lawrence Summers '11
[]
Friday, October 27, 2017 6:51 PM
20171027185100
<p>saudi?</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025129
593
189
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025128.txt
Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric
3
Larry Summers < >
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 10:59 AM
20171027105900
<p>Was there. Spoke well. Spent time w Softbank deputy Najeev or some such PIF guy too.</p><p>Flying back.</p><p>How is life among the lucrative and louche?</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025129
594
189
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025128.txt
Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric
4
Jeffrey Epstein
Lawrence Summers
[]
Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:02 PM +0400
20171027150200
<p>anyone stand out...? when we meet I will endeavor to mesmerize you with stories of D.C. so wild!!!.</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025128
595
189
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025128.txt
Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric
5
Larry Summers -
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 11:10 AM
20171027111000
<p>Softbank deputy guy i liked and seemed aware and honest re Son.</p><p>Lots of slathering to saudis. I yipped about inclusion.</p><p>I observed that half the IQ In world was possessed by women without mentioning they are more than 51 percent of population....</p><p>Mnuchin plumbs new depths.</p><p>War seems more likely than I used to think</p><p>DjT is world s luckiest guy in terms of opposition, economy etc. still think his world will collapse.</p><p>I'm trying to figure why American elite think if u murder your baby by beating and abandonment it must be irrelevant to your admission to Harvard, but hit on a few women 10 years ago and can't work at a network or think tank. DO NOT REPEAT THIS INSIGHT</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025129
596
189
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025128.txt
Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric
6
Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Oct 27, 2017 at 7:46 PM +0400
20171027154600
<p>evangelicals confirmed in their belief of a divine hand. I kid you not. their view. how else ,could one explain DJT winning. To a person they never knew him.</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025128
597
189
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025128.txt
Re: Trending Now: Friends for three decades, Trump whisperer says he is 'stunned' by president's rhetoric
7
Lawrence Summers
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
10/27/2017 3:46:57 PM
20171027154657
<p>Lot of ruin in a nation</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025128
598
190
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025347.txt
Re: Re:
0
Weingarten, Reid
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
10/16/2012 1:00:27 AM
20121016010027
Clinton
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025347
599
190
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025347.txt
Re: Re:
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Weingarten, Reid
[]
Monday, October 15, 2012 04:01 PM
20121015160100
richardson ?? of course or gates?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025347
600
190
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025347.txt
Re: Re:
2
Weingarten, Reid
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:53 PM
20121015235300
What a funny dude you are two weeks from tomorrow...having dinner tonite with your buddy wild bill c...should I bring you up?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025347
601
190
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025347.txt
Re: Re:
3
Jeffrey Epstein
Weingarten, Reid
[]
Monday, October 15, 2012 5:51 PM
20121015175100
not sure, when is your opening? i am not referring to either sheryl or c
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025348
602
190
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025347.txt
Re: Re:
4
Weingarten, Reid
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Mon, Oct 15, 2012 at 11:47 PM
20121015234700
Dealing with the Jackson shitshow right now...options problems are a pimple in an elephant's ass in the case...when are you next in nyc
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025348
603
190
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025347.txt
Re: Re:
5
Jeffrey Epstein
Weingarten, Reid
[]
Monday, October 15, 2012 5:46 PM
20121015174600
do i assume that you have no more option questions?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025348
604
191
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025231.txt
Newsmax. corn
0
Sultan Bin Sulayem
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
8/12/2011 2:43:12 PM
20110812144312
<p>Laffer: Obama Must Use Reaganomics to Save Economy The only way President Barack Obama can solve the nation's economic woes is to adopt "common-sense" Reaganomics, the policy's architect Arthur Laffer claims in an exclusive Newsmax interview.</p><p>Laffer said the White House called him in the spring and asked him to speak to Obama's former Council of Economic Advisors' chairman Austen Goolsbee — and he had told him exactly the same thing.</p><p>"Reaganomics would fix any economy that's in the doldrums," Laffer said. "It's not a magic sauce, it's common sense.</p><p>"You've got to get rid of all federal taxes in the extreme and replace them with a low-rate flat tax on business net sales, and on personal unadjusted gross income. That's number one.</p><p>"Number two, you have to have spending restraint. Government spending causes unemployment, it does not cure unemployment.</p><p>"Number three, you need sound money. Ben Bernanke is running the least sound monetary policy I've ever heard of," Laffer said.</p><p>"Number four you need regulations, but you don't need those regulations to go beyond the purpose at hand and create collateral damage. The regulatory policies are really way off here.</p><p>"And lastly you need free trade," Laffer said. "Foreigners produce some things better than we do and we produce some things better than foreigners. It would be foolish in the extreme if we didn't sell them those things we produce better than they do in exchange for those things they produce better than we do."</p><p>In the interview the veteran economist said Standard &amp; Poor's was quite right in downgrading the U.S. credit rating — in fact it should have done so far earlier.</p><p>The agency had no choice and if the other agencies, Moody's and Fitch, don't do the same they won't be doing their jobs, said Laffer, who gave his name to the Laffer Curve which demonstrates that the maximum amount of government revenue does not come at the point of maximum taxes.</p><p>"If you had a company that had revenues of $2½ million and expenses of $4 million, with no change in sight, $1½ million in losses each year as far as the eye can see and it had already borrowed $10 million, what would you rate that company? I surely wouldn't rate it AAA.</p><p>"That is the U.S. situation today," Laffer said. "Taxes are about $2½ trillion, government spending is about $4 trillion and we have about $10 trillion in net national debt. I don't see that as being a AAA country.</p><p>"If the S&amp;P and the others were doing their jobs correctly, they should have downgraded a long time ago."</p><p>Laffer said he has no doubt the country will win its top rating back, but only when economic policies are completely turned around. He said President Barack Obama's administration's only economic plan seemed to be to expand government ownership of the means of production.</p><p>"They have nationalized the health care industry pretty extensively. They've done that with home building as well. They've tried it with the auto industry as well. So they have moved very, very deliberatively and purposefully toward extending the government ownership of the means of production.</p><p>"That to me, if you read the tealeaves, is what they are doing. It is not what they are saying they are doing, but that is what they actually are doing.</p><p>"People don't work to pay taxes, people work to get what they can after taxes. It's that very private incentive that motivates them to work. If you pay people not to work and tax them if they do work, don't be surprised if you find a lot of people not working."</p><p>Laffer said the current economic woes started to form under President George W. Bush but have been made worse by Obama's policies.</p><p>"There's a wedge driven between wages paid and wages received and that wedge is the tax/government spending wedge," he said.</p><p>"That wedge has grown dramatically in the last 4 ½ years...under W and a Republican administration and...under Obama. Bipartisan ignorance has led us to this very disastrously desolate state."</p><p>Laffer had high praise for the role the tea party has played in bringing the problem of the deficits to the fore.</p><p>"The tea party is not the problem, the tea party may well be the solution," he said. "They are critical to the future of the country in a positive way. They are the only fiscally sound people I know out there all the time.</p><p>"I don't know that I would go as far as they go on a lot of issues but I surely respect their movement very much."</p><p>And he said any one of the group of Republicans vying for the party's nomination for the White House would make "a great president."</p><p>"Tim Pawlenty is spectacular. Newt Gingrich knows more about issues than anyone you've ever seen. Michele Bachmann is out-of-sight wonderful," he said.</p><p>"Rick Perry is second to no one in this stuff. If you look at Herman Cain, he's phenomenal.</p><p>"Oh and (Jon) Huntsman was a great governor of the state of Utah and is a phenomenally experienced intellectual competent man.</p><p>"When you look at the Republican candidates, you see a group of people who are absolutely outstanding in attributes."</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025231
605
192
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025176.txt
Re: Your Special Day
0
David Grosof
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:07 AM
20170120010700
Dear Jeffrey,<br><br>Congratulations on another spin around the sun.<br><br>I would like to offer you a birthday present: my best efforts for a few hours on something where I might be able to contribute either to making something good happen for you or help you prevent the bad. We haven't talked much at all for quite some time, so I'm not sure of the nature of your current interests but here are some of mine, where I feel I either have some special capability or can get access to those who have such.<br><br>* open science -- open access publishing, data publishing, and open culture institutions considered as a network with largely consistent and mutually reinforcing values: Public Library of Science (PLoS), Wikipedia, Internet Archive, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Creative Commons, along with allied US, UK, European governmental and NGO funding sources and other institutions.<br>* early-stage life science-based ventures, especially those with one or more of these technologies: optics, wearable-sensors, brain-computer interface, behavioral engineering that goes beyond robo-noodging. I am not up to speed on synthetic bio and CRISPR, but I have a good friend who is.<br>* cybersecurity for you and your life. I have carefully monitored the web for articles about you and I have reason to think that those will persist indefinitely. I would be remiss as your friend if I did not encourage you to be as diligent and smart as possible in using tools like Signal, two-factor/multi-factor authentication, taking webmail archives off the web onto your own secure privately maintained archive or deleted (unlike Podesta), and other measures.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025177
606
192
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025176.txt
Re: Your Special Day
1
David Grosof
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:28 AM
20170120012800
all good. thx. areas of interest, distributions in nature. deception. sleep. power. money. music and the brain. signal intelligence in the biological systems<br><br>Excellent alignment with some of my interests or those of people I like and think are smart! The rest of the truncated message has been sent.<br><br>1. What's been stimulating as a source of good questions for the "distributions in nature" issue?<br>7. "Signal intelligence in biological systems" seems to cover all of neurophysiology: Jonathan Victor, whom you met a few years ago in your office, is powerfully thoughtful on the issues of neural coding. Are there specific examples that have stimulated you to better questions or turned your thinking around?<br>6. Are you aware of apps that purport to play music to enhance productivity and focus on tasks at hand? My buddy Reese Jones has backed that; he has a fascinating set of beliefs and projects around what may soon be understood as "consciousness hacking." He's on the board of Singularity University as one of the founders. (His father was a pioneer UCSF MD researcher of hallucinogens, I believe!)<br>More to come in a day or so.<br>Thanks!<br>You're up late or you're not so east of my SF location!
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025176
607
192
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025176.txt
Re: Your Special Day
2
Jeffrey Epstein
David Grosof
[]
Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 2:47 AM
20170120024700
1. is probability a force rather than a marker. if you look at a bell curve from scratch, it looks as if it under a force pushing things towards the center. i think gravity might be just that. 2. all signals in nature need to be encrypted so that the enemy cannot read. this includes inner signals that if you are aware of, can give you up to your predator. so signals from the nose , my conjecture is that each person has its own encryption algorithm built in. fyi having dinner with Jin Watson.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025176
608
192
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025176.txt
Re: Your Special Day
3
David Grosof
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:02 AM
20170120070200
Probability as a force rather than a what? Didn't suss out the next word...<br><br>Watson's pretty wild and fun, if overconfident about some ideas about autism when I saw him talk ~4 years ago on book tour @Google. I met him once through Gunther Stent, as well as Crick on another occasion. Know him well?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025176
610
192
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025176.txt
Re: Your Special Day
5
David Grosof
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:11 AM
20170120071100
Cool. And the former question, of clarification?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025176
611
192
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025176.txt
Re: Your Special Day
6
Jeffrey Epstein
David Grosof
[]
Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 4:14 AM
20170120041400
probability and statistics gets its strength from the law of large numbers. centrifugal force is a pseudo force but not distinguishable in the right frame. like gravity, lets assume that there is a force pushing heads and tails towards a 50 50 distribution. not merely recording it. regression to the mean. etc. would. could be a force similar to the EM one.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025176
612
192
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025176.txt
Re: Your Special Day
7
David Grosof
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:26 AM
20170120072600
http://xkcd.com/123/ can't resist!
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025176
613
192
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025176.txt
Re: Your Special Day
8
Jeffrey Epstein
David Grosof
[]
1/20/2017 12:32:18 PM
20170120123218
yes , now assume that there is a balancing force. and gravity is merely the result of particles being pushed together . etc
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025176
614
193
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025202.txt
Re: deja' vu' by pk
0
Jeffrey Epstein
paul krassner
[]
9/18/2018 10:40:13 PM
20180918224013
great
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025202
615
193
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025202.txt
Re: deja' vu' by pk
1
paul krassner
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 3:48 PM
20180918154800
Why I Leaked the Anita Hill Affidavit<br/>I shall identify myself only as a female aide to a Republican senator. It is also relevant that I have long nurtured a keen interest in psycho-history, the process by which a nation's direction is interpreted as an extension of the psychological makeup of those individuals who govern it.<br/>Without going into specific detail, let me simply state that on October 5, 1991, I happened to hear part of a conversation among Judge—now Supreme Court Justice—Clarence Thomas, Senator Orrin Hatch and Senator Alan Simpson. The three were meeting informally one week after the Judiciary Committee voted, first 7-7, then 13-1, to recommend the confirmation of Judge Thomas, and one day after the full Senate indicated that he would be confirmed.<br/>The conversation I happened to hear had to do with those charges brought by Anita Hill and ignored by the members of the committee, both Democratic and Republican. At that point in time I still thought this was an appropriate response, because the alternative would have been to hold an executive session, and Judge Thomas would then have had no practical choice but to resort to heavy denial. Now, however, these men were, in a jocular fashion, acknowledging the truth of what would turn out to be Professor Hill's allegations.<br/>Senator Simpson was saying, "Y'know, Clarence, I've seen some pretty raunchy porno movies in my time, but I never did see one where a lady was having sex with an animal."<br/>"I'll never forget it," Judge Thomas replied in his riveting sonorous tone. "They were in a barn. Except that the inside of the barn was like a theater."<br/>Senator Hatch interjected, "Summer stock, eh? No pun intended"<br/>"There was a stage at one end," Judge Thomas continued his description, "and the stage was facing rows and rows of wooden folding chairs. There were haystacks piled up on the stage, and in front of the haystacks there was a beautiful, buxom, blond woman—and a donkey. Well, the woman began disrobing and she started stroking the donkey to arousal."<br/>"Doesn't sound at all sleazy to me," Senator Simpson said.<br/>"Actually, it had Beethoven piano sonatas playing in the background," Judge Thomas said. "Well, when the woman was fully disrobed and the donkey was fully aroused, they began copulating, right there in front of those haystacks on the stage of that barn. Slow and sensual. Then bumping and grinding away, accompanied by passionate moans and wild braying. You've never seen a sight like this, I promise. And then the camera panned slowly toward the audience . . . and the audience consisted entirely of donkeys."<br/>The Senate office shook with raucous laughter, especially that of Judge Thomas. His booming guffaws rang like huge gongs in a church belfry. And, I must admit, I had to suppress my own laughter. I had been totally caught by surprise, but I appreciated getting the insight. Homo sapiens is, in reality, the only species that has a need for pornography.<br/>When the group's laughter finally began to simmer down, Senator Hatch said, "I suppose that movie was one of the demands of the animal rights people."<br/>"That's correct," Senator Simpson added. "Saving animals' lives is no longer enough. They need culture."<br/>I felt like I was imprisoned in the boys' locker room, but I was getting ready to force myself to leave anyway, and it would have ended right there for me if the subject matter hadn't returned to Anita Hill.<br/>"I'm glad nobody considered calling her to testify against me, even for a closed-door session," Judge Thomas said. "But you fellas will really love this. Anita Hill was a very opinionated young lady. Actually, she and I once had an extremely animated discussion on the decriminalization of abortion. Can you imagine what the Democrats would've done with that?"<br/>And that was the precise instant I made the decision to leak Professor Hill's statement to the press. Although I have constantly been sexually hassled, I have never really been harassed in the legal sense of the word.<br/>However, I have had an abortion, and I was totally outraged by the blatant hypocrisy I'd overheard. I had never leaked a document before, but my anger overshadowed my fear.<br/>I chose Nina Totenberg because I had come to trust her reporting about the Supreme Court on National Public Radio. I honestly had no idea what leaking the affidavit would accomplish. I certainly did not envision that it would literally embarrass the Senate into delaying the vote until public hearings were held, though that probably was my secret desire.<br/>But Judge Thomas testified under oath that he had never discussed the subject of abortion. However, in response to a question by Senator Hank Brown, Professor Hill testified that she had disagreed with Judge Thomas in a discussion about Roe v. Wade. Unfortunately, then-Senator Joseph Biden quickly interrupted her.<br/>"That is not the subject of these hearings," he said.<br/>Personally, I feel quite disappointed about that particular aspect of the testimony, but I have not the slightest regret over leaking Anita Hill's affidavit, and I would gladly do it all over again.<br/>I certainly set a higher moral standard for myself than did the staffer for Senator John Danforth who wrote Judge Thomas's statement that began, "Nobody helped me with this."
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025203
616
194
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
Re:
0
habebey
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
9/13/2017 5:31:25 PM
20170913173125
i m in my car at your door.. can i ring or 2 sharp?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661
617
194
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
Re:
1
Jeffrey Epstein
habebey
[]
Sep 13, 2017, at 4:07 AM
20170913040700
Wed at 2?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661
618
194
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
Re:
2
tamem
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Wed, Sep 13, 2017 at 12:26 AM
20170913002600
hi habebey i m in new york .. the sooner we meet the faster i go back to be with my son on his first week in a new school..<br/>if you bussy dont worry i can wait until thursday<br/>thnx again
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661
619
194
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
Re:
3
Jeffrey Epstein
habebey
[]
Sep 9, 2017, at 7:43 PM
20170909194300
see you then :)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661
620
194
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
Re:
4
habebey
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:42 PM
20170909184200
thursday at 6 pm? is that ok?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661
621
194
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
Re:
5
Jeffrey Epstein
habebey
[]
Sep 9, 2017, at 7:40 PM
20170909194000
when is good for you? late thurs? fri lunch whatever you prefer.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661
622
194
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
Re:
6
habebey
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:35 PM
20170909183500
very well .. plz when you have a minute send me the date and the time .. i know the house by now
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661
623
194
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
Re:
7
habebey
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 6:30 PM
20170909183000
are we meeting in new york?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661
624
194
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
Re:
8
Jeffrey Epstein
tamem
[]
Sep 9, 2017, at 7:16 PM
20170909191600
is this some sort of perverted question :) 12 american. of course
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661
625
194
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
Re:
9
habebey
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 5:40 PM
20170909174000
what is your shoes size if you dont mind me asking?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661
626
194
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
Re:
10
Jeffrey Epstein
habebey
[]
Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 4:30 AM
20170909043000
I think trump cut the legs off your guy. He would like to take all the credit. If there is a deal or be seen to be strong on terror
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661
627
194
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
Re:
11
Jeffrey Epstein
habebey
[]
Sat, Sep 9, 2017 at 2:34 AM
20170909023400
See you I in. Ew york thurs?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661
628
194
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
Re:
12
111
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 11:48 PM
20170908234800
tamem just called mbs .. he want to sit and talk .. breakthrough
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661
629
194
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
Re:
13
Jeffrey Epstein
<111>
[]
Sep 8, 2017, at 1:33 PM
20170908133300
I will get larson to call you
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661
630
194
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
Re:
14
111
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 12:26 PM
20170908122600
i will bring you some kuwaiti gifts but not food
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661
631
194
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
Re:
15
Jeffrey Epstein
habebey
[]
Sep 8, 2017, at 11:52 AM
20170908115200
what is your schedule in new york how long will you be there?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661
632
194
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
Re:
16
<111>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Sep 8, 2017 at 9:09 AM
20170908090900
things look very bad in the gulf.. my feeling trump do not want to end it
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661
633
194
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661.txt
Re:
17
Jeffrey Epstein
<111>
[]
Sep 8, 2017, at 2:28 AM
20170908022800
your man did well. congragulations
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_023661
635
195
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025349.txt
Re: Is Donald still feeling good
1
LHS < >
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Sun, May 28, 2017 at 7:36 PM
20170528193600
More would represent Donald if Kaslowitz out of picture. Not surprising, very hard to be law firm representing POTUS and know what to do when potus lies to u.<br><br>My world thinks poorly of Gorelick for representing Jared.<br><br>How guilty is Donald?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025349
637
195
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025349.txt
Re: Is Donald still feeling good
3
LHS < >
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 9:13 PM -0400
20170601211300
prospectus<br><br>With demand happy to consider and likely do. Dont want to go sucking up.<br><br>Did Klein do it again? Agree bad business. Or are u referring to what u talked about months ago.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025349
638
195
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025349.txt
Re: Is Donald still feeling good
4
LHS < >
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Thu, Jun 1, 2017 at 11:08 PM
20170601230800
??
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025349
639
195
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025349.txt
Re: Is Donald still feeling good
5
Jeffrey Epstein
Lawrence Summers
[]
6/2/2017 7:46:46 AM
20170602074646
Lisa biz
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025349
640
196
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025524.txt
Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'
0
Steve Bannon
Jeffrey Epstein
["Sean Bannon"]
3/12/2018 1:04:06 AM
20180312010406
K
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025524
641
196
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025524.txt
Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Steve Bannon<____________________>
[]
Sun, 11 Mar 2018 21:03:53 +0100
20180311210353
Unfortunately I just spoke to one of the country leaders that we discussed„ I will fly there tomorrow night now and then to new york wednesday night. sorry. will be in new york thurs and friday. we should lay out a strategy plan. . how much fun... travel safe.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025524
642
196
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025524.txt
Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'
2
Steve Bannon
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Mar 11, 2018, at 8:47 PM
20180311204700
Pretty powerful
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025524
643
196
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025524.txt
Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'
3
Jeffrey Epstein
Steve Bannon
[]
Mar 11, 2018, at 8:42 PM
20180311204200
luv it
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025524
644
196
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025524.txt
Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'
4
Steve Bannon
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Mar 11, 2018, at 8:39 PM
20180311203900
Germans get it
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025524
645
197
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025172.txt
Re: Your Special Day
0
David Grosof <______________________>
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:07 AM
20170120010700
<p>Congratulations on another spin around the sun.</p><p>I would like to offer you a birthday present: my best efforts for a few hours on something where I might be able to contribute either to making something good happen for you or help you prevent the bad.</p><p>We haven't talked much at all for quite some time, so I'm not sure of the nature of your current interests but here are some of mine, where I feel I either have some special capability or can get access to those who have such.</p><ul><li>open science -- open access publishing, data publishing, and open culture institutions considered as a network with largely consistent and mutually reinforcing values: Public Library of Science (PLoS), Wikipedia, Internet Archive, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Creative Commons, along with allied US, UK, European governmental and NGO funding sources and other institutions.</li><li>early-stage life science-based ventures, especially those with one or more of these technologies: optics, wearable-sensors, brain-computer interface, behavioral engineering that goes beyond robo-noodging. I am not up to speed on synthetic bio and CRISPR, but I have a good friend who is.</li><li>cybersecurity for you and your life. I have carefully monitored the web for articles about you and I have reason to think that those will persist indefinitely. I would be remiss as your friend if I did not encourage you to be as diligent and smart as possible in using tools like Signal, two-factor/multi-factor authentication, taking webmail archives off the web onto your own secure privately maintained archive or deleted (unlike Podesta), and other measures.</li><li>publicity for your cool-ass creative and important philanthropy in support of really good and adventuresome, high-risk basic science research. Most obvious benefit: it would be nice to know you hung out with the bright</li></ul>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025173
646
197
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025172.txt
Re: Your Special Day
1
David Grosof
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:28 AM
20170120012800
<p>all good. A A thx. A A areas of interest, A A A A distribuitionsA in nature. . A A A A 2 deception. A 3. A sleep . 4. A power. 5 money. A 6 music and the brain. 7, signal intellignece in the biologocal systems</p><p>Excellent alignment with some of my interests or those of people I like and think are smart!</p><p>The rest of the truncated message has been sent.</p><p>1. What's been stimulating as a source of good questions for the "distributions in nature" issue?</p><p>7. "Signal intelligence in biol. systems" seems to cover all of neurophysiology: Jonathan Victor, whom you met a few years ago in your office, is powerfully thoughtful on the issues of neural coding. Are there specific examples that have stimulated you to better questions or turned your thinking around?</p><p>6. Are you aware of apps that purport to play music to enhance productivity and focus on tasks at hand? My buddy Reese Jones has backed that; he has a fascinating set of beliefs and projects around what may soon be understood as "consciousness hacking." He's on the board of Singularity University as one of the founders. (His father was a pioneer UCSF MD researcher of hallucinogens, I believe!)</p><p>More to come in a day or so.</p><p>Thanks!</p><p>You're up late or you're not so east of my SF location!</p><p>David</p><p>PS How to trade the Trump-GOP demolition of the welfare state, erratic elevation of risks of trade disruptions and war? Has anyone from the rational center or left given thought to how to respond to a national emergency to cope with a kakistocratic seizure of emergency powers? The Patriot Act was on a 'shelf as you know, ready to be used. What should the better folks in this country have at hand if, say, a port is subject to a radiological attack of unknown origin?</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025172
652
198
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025180.txt
Re: Your Special Day
0
David Grosof
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:07 AM
20170120010700
Dear Jeffrey,<br>A Congratulations on another spin around the sun.<br>A I would like to offer you a birthday present: my best efforts for a few hours on something where I might be able to contribute either to making something good happen for you or help you prevent the bad.<br>We haven't talked much at all for quite some time, so I'm not sure of the nature of your current interests but here are some of mine, where I feel I either have some special capability or can get access to those who have such.<br>* open science -- open access publishing, data publishing, and open culture institutions considered as a network with largely consistent and mutually reinforcing values: Public Library of Science (PLoS), Wikipedia, Internet Archive, Electronic Frontier Foundation, and Creative Commons, along with allied US, UK, European governmental and NGO funding sources and other institutions.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025181
654
198
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025180.txt
Re: Your Special Day
2
David Grosof
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 1:28 AM
20170120012800
At 10:13 PM 01/19/17, you wrote:<br>all good.A A thx.A A areas of interest,A A A A distribuitionsA in nature. .A A A A 2 deception.A 3.A sleep . 4.A power. 5 money.A 6 music and the brain. 7, signal intellignece in the biologocal systems<br>Excellent alignment with some of my interests or those of people I like and think are smart! The rest of the truncated message has been sent.<br>1. What's been stimulating as a source of good questions for the "distributions in nature" issue?<br>7. "Signal intelligence in biol. systems" seems to cover all of neurophysiology: Jonathan Victor, whom you met a few years ago in your office, is powerfully thoughtful on the issues of neural coding. Are there specific examples that have stimulated you to better questions or turned your thinking around?<br>6. Are you aware of apps that purport to play music to enhance productivity and focus on tasks at hand? My buddy Reese Jones has backed that; he has a fascinating set of beliefs and projects around what may soon be understood as "consciousness hacking." He's on the board of Singularity University as one of the founders. (His father was a pioneer UCSF MD researcher of hallucinogens, I believe!)<br>More to come in a day or so.<br>Thanks!<br>You're up late or you're not so east of my SF location!
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025181
661
198
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025180.txt
Re: Your Special Day
9
David Grosof
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Fri, Jan 20, 2017 at 7:44 AM
20170120074400
Is there something for central tendency that is like an inertial reference frame, from which a different abstract understanding of probability develops, one that's better for showing the kloodgey, apparent force nature to which you point?
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025181
662
198
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025180.txt
Re: Your Special Day
10
Jeffrey Epstein
David Grosof
[]
1/20/2017 1:03:10 PM
20170120130310
god s reference frame :)
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025180
663
199
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025548.txt
FYI
0
Edward Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
8/18/2017 1:23:10 PM
20170818132310
<p>Hi Jeff</p><p>I thought this might interest you</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025548
664
200
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025547.txt
Fwd: US Saudi Arms deal but Note Blackstone Infrastructure Fund with SAMA
0
Richard John Nawrot
Terje Rod-Larsen
["Andreas Kraus", "George Henderson"]
May 23, 2017 at 15:13:12 GMT+4
20170523151312
<p>Terje, the attached article appeared in today's FT, I have removed the defence part related to the US$110bn arms deal but highlighted the separate deal done with Blackstone to establish a fund for US infrastructure this is akin / precedent to what we seek to achieve with SAMA focused on global investment fund in Airport Infrastructure — Best Richard.</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025547
665
200
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025547.txt
Fwd: US Saudi Arms deal but Note Blackstone Infrastructure Fund with SAMA
1
Terje Rod-Larsen
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
5/27/2017 11:19:59 AM
20170527111959
<p>Sent from my iPhone</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025547
666
201
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025533.txt
Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'
0
Sean Bannon
Jeffrey Epstein
["Steve Bannon"]
3/11/2018 8:08:31 PM
20180311200831
<p>Roger that. Thanks for having us today.</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025533
667
201
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025533.txt
Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Mar 11, 2018, at 9:03 PM
20180311210300
<p>Unfortunately I just spoke to one of the country leaders that we discussed„ I will fly there tomorrow night now and then to new york wednesday night. sorry. will be in new york thurs and friday. we should lay out a strategy plan. . how much fun... travel safe.</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025533
669
201
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025533.txt
Re: Filed: German Media Confess to Underestimating Steve Bannon; He Is 'As Dangerous as Ever'
3
Jeffrey Epstein
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Mar 11, 2018, at 8:42 PM
20180311204200
<p>luv it</p>
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025533
671
202
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025514.txt
Re: poetry and science
0
Lisa New
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
Tue, Dec 2, 2014 at 1:29 PM
20141202132900
Dear Jeffrey,<br>Apropos of our conversation of a few minutes ago, This proposal went to someone I thought was interested in the environment and science but who seems, in fact, far more interested in supporting TV on a broad range of topics.<br><br>500,000 would fund this initiative as the second HGSE course (after Poetry of the City) and could begin immediately, Jan 1.. I'd be thrilled to include other scientists you name, perhaps taping the group in a session on metaphor at the edges of fields.<br><br>INote that taped sessions already include economics, marine biology, astronomy, evolutionary biology, zoology, physics and computer science. Richard Dawkins, Walter Isaacson, David Mossberg and David Malan have all said yes to tapings. Footage for all the others is already shot and ready for post production.<br><br>I am having a drink with Dean of Ed School today and can explore this with him among other topics<br><br>Lisa<br><br>Poetry in America for Teachers II: The Poetry of Earth, Sea, and Sky<br>Combining study of poetry with study of science, environment and the visual arts. Materials include hundreds archival images and live footage shot in Cape Cod, Nantucket, Vermont, New York, Connecticut, Jamaica, Aspen, California, Papua New Guinea including oceans, ponds, marshes, birds, fish mountains, coral reefs, forests as well in some major collections (HMNH etc)<br>with author Michael Pollan on Joel Barlow (and colonial agriculture)<br>with economist Lawrence Summers on Oliver Wendell Holmes, (and technology and "one hoss shay" depreciation)<br>with Harvard students at the Nantucket Whaling Museum and with , John Steele, editor of the science magazine, Nautilus, on Lowell and Melville<br>with Vice President Al Gore on Ralph Waldo Emerson ,and, with eco-critic Lawrence Buell (with footage taped on the Concord River as well as in Harvard's Houghton Rare Book Library )<br>with a dozen Harvard students and Boston area school teachers on Emily Dickinson's "skies" (shot at Emily Dickinson's home in Amherst Massachusetts) and with ED 's original mss. at Harvard University<br>with Jane Pickering In Harvard's Museum of Natural History on Marianne Moore, zoology and science museums<br>with Martin Espada and other New Yorkers (footage shot on the East River) on Whitman and urban greenspace and with Susan Howe on Stevens and parks<br>with Richard Dawkins on Frost, evolution and probability and with Jay Parini, Frost biographer, in Frost's cabin on "The Road not Taken".<br>with Director of the College Board (and writer of the Common Core Standards) , David Coleman on Robert Frost's "Birches" (filmed in a birch grove)<br>with Peter Galison on Einstein and Modernism (taped in the Harvard Scientific Instruments collection in the Harvard Science Center) and with author Walter Isaacson on Einstein and Modernism (Fogg Museum)<br>with Ray Dalio on Marianne Moore( in Rajah Ampat with Conservation International); and with Jane Pickering, Head of the Harvard Natural History Museum, ( filmed in the Harvard Museum of Natural History)<br>with Stefan Weiss, Walt Mossberg and David Malan on coding, computer language and L-A-N-G-U-A-G-E poetry
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025514
672
202
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025514.txt
Re: poetry and science
1
Lisa New
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
12/2/2014 7:15:11 PM
20141202191511
okay. you let me know when you can talk.<br>And I hadn't added to this list neuroscience--where Emily Dickinson has it nailed-- and maybe this would be the right poem for your group. Notice how many metaphors are operating simultaneously here<br><br>The Brain, within its Groove<br>Runs evenly--and true--<br>But let a Splinter swerve--<br>'Twere easier for You--<br>To put a Current back--<br>When Floods have slit the Hills--<br>And scooped a Turnpike for Themselves--<br>And trodden out the Mills--<br><br>I get to New York Thursday am or perhaps tomorrow night...haven't decided quite yet which. Always prefer face to face if you have time<br><br>lisa
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025515
673
203
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025310.txt
Kuhn
0
Robert Kuhn
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
5/8/2017 11:39 PM
20170508233900
Appreciate consideration. I'm next in NY June 7 (for about a week); love to brainstorm.... I too would really like to do something (important) together. Just arrived in Beijing for the "The Belt and Road Forum for International Cooperation" (commentating), the second most important event of 2017 in China (after the upcoming Party Congress), but Western media not paying much attention, what with All-Things-Trump.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025311
674
203
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025310.txt
Kuhn
1
Jeffrey Epstein
Robert Kuhn
[]
May 8, 2017, at 7:03 PM
20170508190300
hope things are well. . when are you back. . I would love to do something with you, but sleep is not going to be it. . I have read quite alot and frankly , the subject is fascinating but i see no real insights, just more questions and mostly the same ones that have been asked for years. . yes, its role in many processes are now becoming apparent. but I see no theories that can hold their own ( yet ).
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025312
675
203
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025310.txt
Kuhn
2
Jeffrey Epstein
Robert Kuhn
[]
May 9, 2017, at 7:52 PM
20170509195200
plant biology. ? great experiments being done. rarely looked at before. root communication. No , I have not lost my mind, . If done well , you would get lots of press. cutting edge technologys for optogenetics , experiments that dont require IRB approval. . its very exciting. do plants get an alzheimer equivalent placque, . als disease. parkinsons , yes it seems so. most cancer drugs are plant derivatives. / lots of fun . good luck in china
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025311
676
203
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025310.txt
Kuhn
3
Robert Kuhn
Jeffrey Epstein
[]
5/11/2017 5:38:37 AM
20170511053837
Ruminating (in Beijing traffic) on plant biology and ways to structure possible Closer To Truth (CTT) series to portray your sense and insights. For plant biology per se, there's probably three strong episodes, with higher production values needed to illustrate ideas/principles (more than the usual CTT talking heads). To fit the CTT framework (and audience expectation), these fascinating discoveries or hints of complex, multifarious mechanisms would need to be explored (even if not yet understood) in terms of simple, fundamental principles (applicable across disciplines - so-called 'general systems theory'). This potential series on plant biology could be extended to 5-6 episodes by including medicinals - plant derivatives that are, for some conditions, best treatments for numerous diseases. This could include, for example, a critical look at Chinese medicine. I think, though, there is a bigger idea lurking here. Your unique ways of thinking, exemplified by plant biology, encourages another, larger possibility for a significant CTT series. Each of the topics you've brought up, and many of your past fundings, sought kinds of breakthroughs or radically new ways of approaching reality and the knowledge and manipulation of reality. So, how about producing a big CTT series on just that - "Radical Breakthroughs"? I can imagine CTT episodes on each of the following kinds of topics you've mentioned, in which radical breakthroughs or deep structural significance are being appreciated: - Plant Biology - Deception (biology) - Power Laws ("found everywhere in nature, Pareto, law of large numbers") - New Math ("category theory, membrane computing, as a new tool for cognition") - Mathematics and Truth - Music ("a tool to interrogate the brain, not a product of but a lens into the inner software") - Dreams ("always on, consciousness blocking access, schizo have sleep disorders") - Power (nature,as you said, "financial, physical, intellectual, ability to do things in a local space") I'm sure there are other such categories of 'radical breakthrough' - for example, several wild ideas in neuroscience, such as levels of information from sub-cellular to massive circuitry. We would clearly unify the topics and episodes with an overarching thematic vision of "radical breakthroughs" that "challenge conventional wisdom" (this phrase was an early Closer To Truth subtitle). Several of these topics can have more than one episode. We can easily produce 13 high-quality episodes and thus have a coherent full season on "Radical Breakthroughs", which would be distributed and marketed as such. Such an approach to "Radical Breakthroughs" is core CTT - in fact, I attempted this as part of the very first CTT series in 1999/2000 "How do Breakthroughs Change Science" - with evolutionary biologist Francisco Ayala; philosopher and neuroscientist Patricia Smith Churchland; author/astronomer Timothy Ferris; child psychologist Rochel Gelman; and astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson - https://www.closertotruth.com/roundtables/how-do-breakthroughs-change-science "What are the Big Questions of Science?" - with evolutionary biologist Francisco Ayala; philosopher and neuroscientist Patricia Smith Churchland; author/astronomer Timothy Ferris; theoretical physicist Steve Koonin; and astrophysicist Neil deGrasse Tyson - https://www.closertotruth.com/roundtables/what-are-the-big-questions-science Though the production values of these early shows are much lower than our current version (since 2008), the content and contributors suggest how CTT can do a big new series - a full season of 13 episodes - on "Radical Breakthroughs". Appreciate specific direction, so that when we meet, I can be prepared Love to do something big and dramatic together.
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025310
677
204
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025329.txt
Fwd: Manson Girls / Acid Trip Agreement
0
paul krassner [paulkrassner@roadrunner.com]
Nancy Cain
["Tom", "Steven Gaydos", "George Krassner", "Holly Krassner Dawson", "Marie Moneysmith", "Linda W. Grossman", "Daniel Dawson", "Danny Goldberg", "Caryl Ratner", "Kevin Bright", "Michael Simmons", "Samuel Leff", "Bob Fass", "Lynnie Tofte Fass", "Lee Quarnstrom", "Barb Cowles"]
1/16/2019 7:50:41 PM
20190116195041
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025329
678
204
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025329.txt
Fwd: Manson Girls / Acid Trip Agreement
1
Lonnie Martin < >
paul krassner < >
[]
January 16, 2019 at 6:50:44 AM PST
20190116145044
Hi Paul.<br><br>Thanks so much for sharing both your note to Steven and your latest Manson essay with me. It's always wild to read that piece. I have parts of it memorized at this point.<br><br>After reading your comment about vibes from the movie, I feel like I have some explaining to do. This is all stream of consciousness writing so take it on merit, I guess. No harm is meant.<br><br>As 'The Last of the Manson Girls' got closer to completion, I was insanely nervous about showing it to you. I knew it there was very little in it that was "Truth" in terms of minute details. What I did was take the broad strokes of your essay and make it into the "beats" of my story.<br><br>For example, Sandy's invitation to take a bath formed the spine of the "mermaid" scene. Squeaky's line, "Manson never took anybody who wasn't already discarded by the society" formed the spin of the animated fever dream where she talks about her father. The visit to Merrick was a good place to get into some of my views about conspiracy and the human mind's ability to latch on to anything to avoid unpleasant facts. Squeaky's line "Well what do you expect from me. I'm crazy" was obviously later then this meeting, but it was just too good a line to let go.<br><br>I didn't use elements of your essay that made actual filming and production tougher. For example, the interlude in your essay where you went to a home of friend of the family and smoked weed for example became "you" smoking weed at their pad.<br><br>I added in beats, character traits and dialogue that helped form that "dramatic arc" that works in movies so well. You and the Manson Women must have talked about far more than you mentioned in your essay, but I took liberties with what was said and how it was presented. Maybe I should have reached out to you about these conversations. I guess I was afraid of the Truth getting in the way of a good story.<br><br>All the Mae Brussel stuff is there because its seemed a simple (Ha!) way to explain to the audience "Why is Paul going there?" Squeaky asking for the LSD rather than you bringing it was, again, an easy and short way to explain to the audience why LSD was involved.<br><br>There's a lot of my personal experience in the film. I *did* have a panic attack while on LSD and passed out hugging a toilet. (I didn't however go to a desert/beach and talk to futuristic Squeaky Fromme, though I was in the desert when it happened.) I once had a very contentious creative friendship with one of my best friends who is a friend no longer. That seemed to mirror some of your relationship with Lenny Bruce. I also felt like your relationship with Lenny had so much to do with your evolution as a writer, satirist, and comedian that it seemed proper to put that in there. I wrestled a *long* time over even mentioning your daughter because it seemed more of a personal invasion than you had bargained for. However, based on your memoir, it was obvious how important that relationship and aspect of your life was to you.<br><br>The smooching with Squeaky isn't meant to be any kind of bawdy Enquirer scandal. It's tied to the idea that by the end of the movie this "Paul" isn't scared of her. The kiss is mentioned as being symbolic of acceptance and despite all their philosophical differences, "Paul" and Squeaky in the film find a way to "accept" each other. "We've got a find a way to love the people we hate." is the statement I always say at talkbacks when people ask me what the ending of the movie means.<br><br>The movie was conceived and made as a response to my own feelings of doubt about myself, and my growing social irrelevance as I age. (I turned 40 while making it.) It's about coming to terms with the mistakes I've made and the hubris that caused them.<br><br>It's also about resistance fatigue. It asks (in a roundabout way), "What happens if the good guys *do* lose the war?" I saw similarities between how the protest wing of the counterculture may have felt in the wake of RFK, the Weathermen and the SLA, and having the whole movement for something bigger start to go sour as it mainstreamed. The similarities between Nixon and Trump are so obvious, I feel like I don't even need to mention them. I saw similarities in your spiritual journey to mine. "Paul Krassner" in my script was in some ways a vessel to project all my own hang-ups onto. I suppose that's an unfair burden to put on you.<br><br>I don't know if this all sounds like excuse-making, but it's my way of saying that I certainly don't want to "break a legacy." I think the work you did with "The Realist" is important and paved the way for the Onion, The Daily Show, and society's general acceptance of raw, cutting satire in the world of politics and journalism. The last thing I would ever want to do is have that be tainted. Film has that power of course. The medium by it's nature hypnotizes, and has a funny way of clouding up the truth. Fiction becomes history and vice versa.<br><br>More than anything, I don't want you to feel taken advantage of or disrespected.<br><br>I probably should have explained this to you earlier. I probably should have called and had a conversation with you about it, and I'm happy to still do that.<br><br>Thank you again for allowing me to tell this story, even through my own distorted lens.<br><br>All the best,<br>Lonnie
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025330
680
205
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025185.txt
Re: Your Special Day
1
Jeffrey Epstein
David Grosof
[]
1/20/2017 1:04:00 PM
20170120130400
god - so he does play, just not with fair dice
HOUSE_OVERSIGHT_025185